The tools I actually use
Not a course on building AI tools. Just what I use to get through treatment: some I've built, some I've found. For personal stuff I use Google: Gemini (including Gems, which are custom versions of Gemini you set up yourself) and NotebookLM. I use Claude for work.
Chemo Tracker Gem
I talk, it logs.
Master Chemo Tracker
A Google Doc. Paste it in so nothing gets lost.
Cancer Vault
NotebookLM: the doc plus every blood test, scan and letter.
My One View
The card and profile on this site.
Alongside that: advisor Gems for the professionals I see outside my hospital team, and Radical Health for questions, second opinions and trials.
1. The Chemo Tracker Gem
I've tracked the ups and downs of chemo with AI for a long time. Every day I tell it how I'm doing: energy, mood, sickness, skin, bowels, food, sleep, whatever's going on.
The biggest change I've made: I've stopped scoring myself out of ten.
When you rate your own mood and energy every day, you get stuck in a narrow band of numbers. You never drop to a one. You never hit a ten. Everything ends up a five, six or seven, and the change you're trying to track disappears.
So I've set the Gem up to listen to what I say, in my own words, and make its own call on how I'm doing. It won't always be bang on. But it's consistent, which makes it the most honest way I've found of seeing change over months rather than days.
I also use it to keep an eye on my diet, and to get through some of the grimmer side effects.
2. My two-week cycle plan
Once I had the first two cycles tracked, I used that data to build a day-by-day plan for a two-week chemo cycle: what's likely to hit when, and what helps.
It means day 3 isn't a surprise anymore. I know it's coming, and I know what to do about it.
Mine maps all fourteen days: energy out of ten, what movement is realistic, how much work I can do, when to rest, what to eat, and which medicines step up when. Day 1 infusion. The fatigue wall on day 4. The nadir on day 5. The rebound from day 8, when I go back to the gym and do my best thinking. Then pre-infusion, and round again.
How the tracking becomes the map
This is the bit people ask about, so here's the actual process. It takes me about twenty minutes at the end of a cycle.
- Two weeks of rough notes. Every day I tell the Gem how I'm doing, out loud, in my own words. No form, no scoring. It logs energy, sleep, bowels, rash, mood, what I ate, what I managed to do.
- Lay the last cycle next to the plan. At the end of the fortnight I ask one question: where did the plan say one thing and my body do another? Not "how was it" — specifically where the prediction broke.
- Find what actually repeats. Two cycles is a coincidence. Three or four is a pattern. The nadir landing on days 4 and 5, the fog breaking on day 8, the rash peaking around day 10 — those held often enough to plan around. Plenty of other things didn't, and got dropped.
- Change one thing at a time. Each cycle carries one or two deliberate changes, written down before it starts so I can't rewrite the story afterwards. This cycle: no pre-infusion fast, and I'm trialling the take-home steroid in the mornings.
- Write the next fourteen days. Energy forecast, what movement is realistic, how many hours of work and for which business, when to rest, what to eat, which medicines step up when. Then the two boxes that matter most: what to have in the house before Wednesday, and what to raise with my team.
- Carry the failures forward. Metformin has now failed twice because I keep starting it at the nadir, when my gut is at its worst. That's on this cycle's map as an open question: start it on day 8 instead, when things are calm.
The useful part isn't the prediction. It's that a bad day becomes an expected day. Day 5 flat on my back isn't a sign of decline, it's day 5 doing what day 5 does — and on day 8 I'll be in the gym. Knowing that is the difference between managing treatment and being managed by it.
It also makes me a better patient to treat. When I say the gut trouble lands on days 4 and 5 every time, that's fourteen cycles of logged data talking, not a guess made in a ten-minute appointment.
A caution worth stating plainly: this is a plan, not a prediction, and it's mine. The doses, timings and medicines are set with my own team for my own treatment. Build your own from your own data and your own clinicians — don't run mine.
I rebuild it every cycle, at the same time as my bloods, because it changes as treatment does.
My cycle map · Cycle 5
The current version, as a PDF. It's mine, not a template: doses and timings are set with my own team. What's worth stealing is the format.
3. The Master Chemo Tracker and my Cancer Vault
You can't rely on a chat tool like a Gem to hold months of information. So once a week I copy everything from the Gem into a Google Doc called Master Chemo Tracker. It's fixed, I know where it is, and it's not going anywhere.
That doc is plugged into a NotebookLM notebook I call my Cancer Vault. Alongside the tracker it holds all my blood results, scan reports and clinic letters, going back as far as I can get them, plus other data I've gathered over the years, like the genetics work I did with Astron Health.
One rule: hard data only. Nothing that isn't scientifically backed. No opinions. Only facts that help someone understand my cancer and how I'm dealing with it.
It's incredibly useful for asking questions about my own history, and it's where the information for my card starts.
A warning, from experience: check the numbers against the original documents. When I asked NotebookLM for a full table of my bloods, it missed about half the values. It's brilliant for finding things. It's not a replacement for the report.
4. Advisor Gems
Over the years I've seen professionals outside my hospital team who've helped with my protocol, off-label drugs, supplements and my head.
I went back through everything I had from them and built a Gem for each one:
- An integrative nutritionist
- An integrative oncologist
- My talk therapy counsellor
Each Gem holds my records of our conversations and the documents they sent me. I ask it to answer the way that person would. Then I can go back and ask what they told me before, or what they'd be likely to suggest now.
You can load in huge amounts of attachments. And if it saves a £250 to £500 session just to be reminded of something they've already told me, I figure it's worth a go.
It's a memory of their advice, not the person. Anything that would change my treatment still goes to the actual professional and to my oncology team.
5. Radical Health
Radical Health is a US company that's built an AI tool that is the best thing I've found by a long shot.
It works a bit like NotebookLM. I've put exactly the same documents into it as my Cancer Vault. The difference is that it's linked to huge amounts of medical information from around the world.
That makes it a great place to keep track of your history, and an incredible source for questions about new treatments and trials. It's helped me with second opinions on off-label drugs and supplements, with managing chemo side effects, and with really personal stuff.
I talk to my nurses about almost everything. But sometimes you just want to type a question in and know the answer is linked to something with some professional clout.
If you're outside the US
It generally links to US hospitals for uploading records. If you have problems, contact them and they'll tell you how to get round it. That's what I did. It was very easy and they were incredibly helpful.
I'm not currently being charged for access. Hopefully that continues for a while.
What it produces
Here's the report it generated from my records on 17 September 2026: my case history, what's driving my treatment, the options, and the questions worth asking. It's the best prep I've had for an appointment.
That's my referral link, so they'll know I sent you. I'm sharing it because it's the best tool I've found, not because anyone asked me to.
⚕️ None of these tools are medical advice, and neither am I. They help me understand my situation and ask better questions. My medical team handles the medicine.